<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>createTank &#187; Snippets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createtank.com/category/snippets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createtank.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:10:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SOA and Downsizing</title>
		<link>http://createtank.com/2007/09/soa-and-downsizing/</link>
		<comments>http://createtank.com/2007/09/soa-and-downsizing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createtank.com/2007/09/04/soa-and-downsizing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Does SOA threaten developer jobs?, much is said about supposed concerns that developers now have over SOA adoption.
So, one might surmise that Jacquard Loom developers once felt insecure about the goings on in assembler and C development, and that C developers once lost sleep over OO and Java development.
So, supposedly, modern developers in general [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://searchwebservices.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid26_gci1270595,00.html?track=NL-110&amp;ad=602060&amp;asrc=EM_NLN_2112149&amp;uid=6455863">Does SOA threaten developer jobs?</a>, much is said about supposed concerns that developers now have over SOA adoption.<span id="more-38"></span></p>
<p>So, one might surmise that Jacquard Loom developers once felt insecure about the goings on in assembler and C development, and that C developers once lost sleep over OO and Java development.</p>
<p>So, supposedly, modern developers in general are living in fear that enterprise SOA directives will take their job away?  Not likely feared.  Not likely true.</p>
<h3>Feared?</h3>
<p>If anything, developers are ready to make their systems more efficient and/or agile.  Only bad developers want to retain old disgusting decrepit code.  Only bad developers like to hamper the efforts of forward thinking change.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, there are plenty of bad developers out there.  But in the long run, bad developers usually become testers, don&#8217;t they?   ;-P</p>
<h3>True?</h3>
<p>SOA is about business agility applied to IT productivity.  Downsizing development staff is about as likely as OO reuse once was.  If anything, IT staff will swell (and productivity with it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createtank.com/2007/09/soa-and-downsizing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XML Processing on Appliance</title>
		<link>http://createtank.com/2007/08/xml-processing-appliance/</link>
		<comments>http://createtank.com/2007/08/xml-processing-appliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createtank.com/2007/08/01/xml-hardware-processing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[XML processing in hardware to boil down an XML doc for simpler binding to objects:
http://tinyurl.com/2syl99
Most importantly:
&#8220;We use an object binding framework,&#8221; he explained. &#8220;We use XSLT to
transform it in hardware. So when the XML comes in, all the validation,
all the business rules that are applied to it, all the transformations are
done, so we get a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XML processing in hardware to boil down an XML doc for simpler binding to objects<span id="more-37"></span>:<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2syl99" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/2syl99</a></p>
<p>Most importantly:<br />
&#8220;We use an object binding framework,&#8221; he explained. &#8220;We use XSLT to<br />
transform it in hardware. So when the XML comes in, all the validation,<br />
all the business rules that are applied to it, all the transformations are<br />
done, so we get a clean XML that is exactly fitting the object that we<br />
want. So we can make one Java call, say un-marshal, and we have the<br />
object, lo and behold. We don&#8217;t have compiled classes. We have no mapping. Nothing.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createtank.com/2007/08/xml-processing-appliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>REST, XForms, XQuery, and &#8220;skimming&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://createtank.com/2007/06/rest-xforms-xquery-and-skimming/</link>
		<comments>http://createtank.com/2007/06/rest-xforms-xquery-and-skimming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createtank.com/2007/06/15/rest-xforms-xquery-and-skimming/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting concept: REST, XForms, XQuery, and &#8220;skimming&#8221; &#8211;
Pattern of holding data on the server in a native XML database, and offloading all translation and processing to the client.
See: REST, XForms, XQuery, and &#8220;skimming&#8221;
eXist XML Open Source native XML database (mentioned in previous entry):
http://exist.sourceforge.net/
Very cool (eXist example &#8211; XQuery sandbox):
http://demo.exist-db.org/sandbox/sandbox.xql
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting concept: REST, XForms, XQuery, and &#8220;skimming&#8221; &#8211;<br />
Pattern of holding data on the server in a native XML database, and offloading all translation and processing to the client.<span id="more-33"></span><br />
See: <a href="http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/2006/09/xforms-rest-xqueryand-skimming.html" target="_blank">REST, XForms, XQuery, and &#8220;skimming&#8221;</a></p>
<p>eXist XML Open Source native XML database (mentioned in previous entry):<br />
<a href="http://exist.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank">http://exist.sourceforge.net/</a></p>
<p>Very cool (eXist example &#8211; XQuery sandbox):<br />
<a href="http://demo.exist-db.org/sandbox/sandbox.xql" target="_blank">http://demo.exist-db.org/sandbox/sandbox.xql</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createtank.com/2007/06/rest-xforms-xquery-and-skimming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
